Log in

No account? Create an account
Mama Deb
.:::.:....... ..::...:
Mama Deb [userpic]
Preaching to the Converted

jonbaker has a Talmud class tonight. Okay, he has a Talmud class every night, in that he's part of the Daf Yomi, page a day, program, but on Tuesdays he goes to a longer class in Manhattan.

Anyway, since I have the night alone, I thought I'd go to this program on tzniut, modesty.

If it had been a live program, that would have been interesting, especially with the sheitl situation. But it was a video. And they said nothing new, nothing that this audience had never heard before. This audience was mostly from Boro Park. It was, of course, completely female - high school girls in uniform, unmarried older girls, and married women of all ages. (In these communities, unmarried adults are called "girls" and "boys", so a "man" can be younger than a "boy".)

I saw a lot of sheitls - many looking like plastic, but I couldn't really tell. A number had an extra covering, as is common in this community - a little straw hat or a very wide headband. I also saw a lot of ladies wearing snoods and a couple wearing hats. I'd chosen to wear a scarf.

That's not the point, but it's what I saw. The audience was already being rather strict on the laws of modesty - not just the bare law or the tiny bit over that I do in covering my elbows. Most of these ladies were wearing long sleeves and loose tops and thick stockings. Most of these women were living these laws. I live these laws.

This program wasn't to get the women watching to be more tzniut. This was to for them to feel good that they are doing a mitzvah "more important than Shabbat." And that's certainly a good thing. Did it work? I don't know. I found it deadly.

I'm following these laws because these are the laws. On hot humid summer days, I'd rather not wear an overshirt, but fine.

I don't think they make me better as a person. They do enhance my self-esteem, because I'm covering my body not out of shame but because it's something nice not for public consumption. That's official. That's the same feeling I get during my periods of niddah, when I keep myself more or less covered around my husband. It's both the law and his request - he doesn't want to see what he can't touch.

This is a tremendous boost to my ego.

Does it make me a better Jew? Only in that obeying any mitzvah makes one a better Jew. Unlike one of the rebbitzens in tonight's video, I don't think it's more important than Shabbat.

I left early, when the video ended with an ad for a learning program using a book I've already read and, in many cases, disagreed with. It was past 10:15 at that point and I had to take two buses home.

Re: my $0.02

I don't think Mamadab is upset to see comment threads in her journal discussing halacha, custom, etc. Mamadeb?

As for not being observant, so what? As long as everyone is civil, why should anyone be excluded from a discussion? I'll agree that it can help to give one's individual background/observance information, but at the same time, I'm not planning to make religious decisions based solely on something someone writes on LJ, and I really hope no one bases religious decisions based solely on what I write.

As for where "bottom-line halacha" is, I know that Yeshiva University (in the 1960s) and Yeshivat Ramaz (in the 1980s) both had no problem with women's elbows showing. I also know that some people consider Ramaz a "girls' school" (it's co-ed; the term was used to mean that it wasn't a "real" Yeshiva) and both Ramaz and YU too "modern", so... As I wrote above, there are lots of different customs from lots of different places, and for all I know even the YU/Ramaz line was originally a community chumrah. Being observant doesn't automatically grant me historical knowledge of everything. *g*

I don't think Mamadab is upset to see comment threads in her journal discussing halacha, custom, etc. Mamadeb?

Mind? I'm loving this. I get to sit back and read the most interesting things and it's all here. :)

As for bottom-line halacha, the knees and elbows are grey areas. So, for that matter, are pants. That I've chosen to go with the stricter views (and boy, do I regret the elbow thing when the heat reaches above 90F) does not mean that the more lenient ones are wrong. The stricter views define the knees and the elbows as part of the thighs and upper arms respectively. Anatomically, this makes very little sense.